This is a photo diary of my costuming "travels"; where I've learned and struggled to make historical costumes for myself. They're not always pretty, but always fun. most of the time. And I want to share with others what I learn along the way. **You can find me on Facebook, or have my posts delivered to your email by signing up at the lower part of the right column.**



About Me

My photo
HI, my name is Val. I'm a member of Costumer's Guild West in Los Angeles, Dean Emeritus of 2018 Costume College; member & Past President of the San Diego Costume Guild, member of Orange County Costume Guild, a representative of the San Diego History Center, & an honorary member of SITU (Someplace in Time, Unlimited) in Seattle. This year I am the Dean of Costume College 2018. I make my own historical costumes but don't sell any unless I get tired of one.The eras I've made so far are 1770 up to 1918. My favorite is the 1880s bustle.

Followers

Thursday, May 31, 2018

My 1795 Open Robe Project

This year for Costume College, I decided I wanted something fairly easy to wear, costume-wise, in the day time walking the halls. I didn’t want to wear street clothes because, hey, I’m the Dean, and I feel like I need to look good and stand out for people to find me. Having to wear bustles and big petticoats, along with all the layers that a bustle dress uses, didn’t seem a wise choice considering I might not have much time. After a discussion on one group I’m on about the open robes of 1795-1810, I decided that would be a good choice, and easy to make.
I wanted two, one for Friday and for Saturday, and planned to use the same white cotton voile dress for it. So, the planning started.
My first search was for the style of my open robes. I was going to make them sleeveless, as it’s quite warm in Los Angeles, even in the air-conditioned hotel. There were many choices of how to make the front of the robe: belted under the bust, crossed over the bust, or almost a jacket. The robe portion could be long, half-length, or even done in panels.



This pink really caught my eye since it was so different. I wished I could have seen the front. It had a lot of details, a mile or so of sawtooth trimming, and a cute little rosette in the back to match the one on the side of her robe. Sadly, as reality and time constraints set in, I realized this would have to be something for a later day as I’m trying to cram 4 dresses into my sewing schedule. So I gave in to just a long straight robe. 


Next up was pattern choosing.  I made my white dress from a previously used pattern, La Mode Bagatelle’s Regency Wardrobe drawstring neckline, since I knew it fits already, and made three quarter-length sleeves. I used a very sheer white dotted Swiss voile. It was so sheer, I had to make a nice solid petticoat to wear under it. I used the skirt from my pattern, taking out one panel so it wasn’t too full, and added some shoulder straps, with a buttoned closure. Easy Peasy! 

I also decided to wear a pair of short front-closing stays since I usually don’t have someone to tie me into my bodiced petticoat. When I try it, it’s just too loose to hold everything in and up. Wearing a shift/chemise, stays, and petticoat, it sure feels like I still have a lot going on under the dress. So much for skipping the bustle idea.
I also plan to make a small bum pad to go under the robe later. I have a pattern diagram for one, but I like the crescent shape of the one shown in the inside of this dress. This holds the dress out in a straight line in the back. 


I did a search for a variety of patterns that could be used for making the open robe and saw some that I hadn’t even realized was an open robe (even though it says Open Robe right on the pattern cover, LOL!).  Once someone had made it up, with some alterations because the pattern artwork on the cover was very misleading, it was quite nice. It was by Mantua Maker #1810-2, an 1800-1820 Open Robe. A belt was added to the front under the bust area and it worked a treat. My friend, Mara, made her’s using a tied belt. You can read about her’s on her blog, Sew Modern, Sew Historical.       http://mimisewmodernsewhistorical.blogspot.com/2018/02/washington-regency-society-12th-night.html

The other one I’d seen on the market before was by Wingeo #256, a 1795-1825 overdress. The only photo I could find of it made up was on someone’s blog, and with no front photos. It seemed a bit shapeless to me from the back. 

I saw another version with a buttoned front bodice using Laughing Moon #126, Bib Front gown, using the inside closure of it and eliminating the bib front that comes up over it. Examples showed either buttoning it, or lacing it closed. I really like this and given time, would like to try that someday too.


But then, being lazy and not wanting to fit a new pattern, I used the same one I’d made in the past, Butterick #4890. It already had a belt but it was separate and used like a real belt. In my alterations I just added a piece to the middle, sewed one side to the bodice and attached the other side with hooks and eyes.  On the closeup of my pink version you can see that better. I still say this is a quick and easy outfit to make, or why else would I be making two day versions and one evening version? (Evening version won’t be shared until later).

This time I did more alterations to the front and actually traced out the bodice to include a belt on both sides.

I wanted my two daytime open robes made of linen, and chose a peach and a fuschia color, which at first the “hot pink” doesn’t look historically correct but actually was. I purchased both linen blends at LA Alex in the Los Angeles Fabric District for $6 a yard. They’ve got a nice body and weight to them, and don’t wrinkle as badly as pure linen does. Also, its machine washable. Win-win!


Since both are plain, I wanted to add some trims to the robes, like plackets with buttons, bows, rosettes, or something. But sadly, when I got around to finally adding some trim, my remnant bits of fabric were nowhere around. I couldn’t even cover any buttons to go on them. They must have gone out in the trash with the whirlwind reorganizing I tried last month. So no pretties got to be added to them. Just call me Plain Jane. 

I asked a Regency Costuming group on Facebook for some suggestions as to what I could use to close my front belts with. I shared a bunch of ideas I’d found. 



I love rhinestone buckles but these were for day dresses. Two suggestions, mother of pearl buckles, and a cameo, were my best shot. I already had a nice cameo surrounded by pearls I could use for the peach robe, and after searching on etsy, I found a set of 3 small mother of pearl buckles for $3.50. These will be closed by pins most likely, also historically correct. 

 

Since my outfit is a bit on the plain side, my accessories will have to dress them up a bit. I can use my coral necklace from Hawaii, and earrings from Dames a la Mode, but not sure yet what I’ll wear on the fuschia. 


And my hair, or lack thereof, I plan to cover up, either with a turban or a cap, with little curls hanging out. No bonnet needed for indoors. I have one of these lace caps, like Mrs. Bennet wears, so that’s my backup.
With these two done (sorry, they’re not ironed yet), I finished my evening version that will be worn at the Friday Night Social at Costume College. And now I’m working on my Gala dress, which had been started a couple months ago, and stalled by indecisions. I swear it evolves every time I pick it up. 



And here’s my little helper, trying to find something for me, probably those missing fabric scraps. 
~~~Val~~~



No comments:

Post a Comment

I would love to hear if this was any help to you. Pretty please!