A month ago,
I thought I was running ahead of the game by being half-done with an 1890s
walking suit to wear to the Port Townsend Victorian Festival in WA. My friends
who I meet up with there, decided we would dress in 1890s from the town’s time
period. This would be just for wearing around town, and to tea before we headed
over to the American Legion Hall to put on the fashion show for the Festival. I
had another dress I was wearing for that which was already made. I had my bases
covered.
But then
Mara kept posting photos of multiple 90s dresses she was making and I felt like
the glove had been thrown down. So, I rationalized I really needed an evening
dress to wear to dinner, and to the ball, which by the way, I just attend and
watch my friends dance, as I’m still not walking well enough to even think
about trying to walk sideways and twirl.
While
folding up some fabrics in my sewing room, I picked up one delicious and silky
mulberry and gold patterned silk damask fabric I’d bought recently after drooling over it
at the tremendous sale of silks they had at Home Fabrics in LA. I bought a
remnant of 7 ½ yards for $5.95 yd. It totally spoke to me of 1890s. So, what’s
a girl to do? The gauntlet had been thrown down, and challenge was accepted.
Apparently,
I did the same thing last year, and made a new dress just weeks before I was
leaving. I can probably blame Mara for that too. At the last minute before
flying up to WA, I made my 1890s Brown Polka Dot dress. Basically, it’s an easy
outfit to do using both Truly Victorian patterns for the skirt and blouse. I
used TV #494 for the 1894 Shirtwaist, but I decided to try the TV #296 Ripple
Skirt with the full panels that are pulled to the back with ties inside,
similar to doing the bustle ties. There’s a lot more fabric in this skirt than
the usual walking skirt I make.
This fashion
print from 1896 shows ripple skirts.
For
my inspiration, I pulled out this photo of a dress I want to make someday in
all its black glory and beading. From this I mainly wanted the idea of the ¾-length
sleeves, some fancy trim on the bodice, and a belt. But, oooh, I do so want to
make this in black someday.
The
shirtwaist went together easily, as in the past, but this time I used the yoke
front so I could have an area to put my trims. This fabric turned out to be a
hard color to find a trim to go on it. I tried looking for some lace fabric and
found the perfect one to cover the whole yoke, but was not going to pay $49.99
yard for it. In the lace trims section, the closest color I could find was kind
of beigey-gold but after laying it over the blouse, it didn’t look dressy
enough. But it sure was pretty. Too bad I don’t have any more fabric left that
I can try something else. But I’ll save that lace for another blouse.
So this
narrow gold trim was the best I could find with a two week window left to make
this. I repeated the trim with a chevron design on both the cuffs.
I can’t
remember if I’ve ever shared how I do my puffy sleeve linings for these, to get
them sticking up in the air, so I took some photos as I was doing it this time.
I used stiff netting, not tulle, for them. I cut out my flat-lining, and then
cut out two layers of the netting but end it about at my elbow. I sew the
netting to one side of the flat-lining fabric with a basting stitch, and trim
the excess netting off. Then I lay that onto the backside of the dress fabric,
with the netting between them. I sew them as you usually sew flat-lining and
then sew the sleeves seams. This way you don’t get poked by the pokey netting.
The skirt
pattern, however, gave me problems from the beginning. I’m used to the fullness
in an 1890s skirt to be all in the back. The Ripple Skirt has wide panels on
the sides and I almost messed up cutting them out when suddenly I saw the
straight-of-grain line on the pattern going horizontal instead of vertical.
After reaching out to others and to the pattern maker, it was confirmed that
yes, that was correct. They are cut so as to make that curve on the sides.
Except I decided since my fabric had a definite pattern line, I wanted to cut
it like all the other panels. So, to answer your question, I did not cut it as
the pattern indicated.
Again, my
1890s-mind wanted to put the placket in the back of the skirt. Except this one
was on the side, and apparently the pleats from the side panels would envelope
it. Mine turned out bulky though. I had to set this aside to finish up my plum
suit and trim some hats before I jumped on the airplane. I figured I’d be able
to finish the skirt hemming and ties while I was at my Mom’s house there.
It did need
a belt though. I tried something new (to me) for inside my belt, cotton belting
that I purchased at JoAnns. It’s not stiff, a little more pliable than the
usual belting, and you can sew through it.
I folded a
long rectangle of my dress fabric over it, and slip-stitched it closed. It
would close in the back with hooks, and I would use a decorative buckle in the
front. I wanted to bring out more gold and when I saw these gold buckles for
sale on a Facebook group, I knew it would be perfect. It would really stand out
rather than a small one would disappear.
Other things
I had to get ready was accessories. I planned to wear my usual wig with a bun,
like this first photo shows. I don’t like the scraped back hair with a tiny
topnotch that so many ladies then wore. I did find a couple crazy ones after
the fact but it will require some more work in the future.
I thought
finally I could wear my pretty comb with gold leaves that I’d bought last year
from Elizabeth Emerson Designs. But when I finally tried to put it on at the
event, my wig cap kept pushing it out, and I was afraid I’d lose it. So it only
got to be stuck in long enough for a photo. After I came home, I did some more
research and have come up with another idea for a headpiece and plan to wear it
later this month in yet another fashion show but locally to me. More on that
later.
It was also
going to be very cold in Port Townsend that evening, and I was resigned to
bringing a shawl. But just a day before I was leaving to fly up there,
Elizabeth Emerson Designs came to my rescue by posting this lovely antique
quilted silk brocade cape. I purchased it and asked her to send it to my Mom’s
house in WA, since it would never get here in time. It was as beautiful as the
photos showed, and inside it, there was a cute little cone-shaped pocket.
So now a day
before I was leaving for WA, I basted my hem on the skirt so I didn’t have to
leave the pins in while traveling. And of course, the moment I set it down,
Chloe took over.
Finally arrived in
WA, I began to finish my skirt. I got it hemmed but when I started looking at
how to do the ties in the back, having a separate skirt lining was messing with
me. The sides where I pleated the excess fabric in was very bulky. And I
figured I would have to attach the lining to the skirt where each tie would be
attached. All of a sudden it was too much! I needed to make this easier for me
as I had 2 days before I needed it. I ripped out the waistband and removed all
the pleating on the skirt. I smoothed out the front and moved all the excess
fabric to the back where I would pleat it as I normally would have. AND……. I
wouldn’t have to figure out how to attach those ties and get it looking proper.
The only drawback was the side placket didn’t go to the back. It was halfway
between my side and the back. This will be one of those projects after I get
home to take out the placket, sew up that seam and move the placket to the
center back. We’ll see if that happens before I wear it on April 22 for a
fashion show in Oceanside, CA. And apparently I need to resize my waistband
closure. I tried it on before the event and it was a bit tight with all my
underpinnings, so I moved the button over 1 inch. Except the day I put it on in
Port Townsend, it was 2 inches TOO BIG. With the weight of the skirt in the
back, it was pulling the waist down and gaping at the waist. We did a quick fix
with a safety pin, but what happened? Maybe my waistline shrunk with all that
cold? Because my feet sure did.
We did a
photo shoot out at Fort Worden and the beach in Port Townsend the last day we
were all there and since I didn’t get any taken of this dress during the
previous evening, I wore this that day.
As luck
would have it, I didn’t even need the cape. I was warm enough in my dress, and
only put the cape on to take a photo of it on me.
I felt half
naked without a hat with my friends that day but I did decide what I want to
make for a headpiece for it now. I found this from a fashion print and will
shortly start digging through the stash of millinery pieces I have to make
something for me. Probably some kind of little capote like this to fit on top of my head.
~~~Val~~~
Throwing down that 1890s glove. ;-)
ReplyDeleteYep, and we ain't done yet!
DeleteVal
And I in turn, throw down the 1840s glove.
DeleteVal
Lovely! Also, dang so that's where Renaissance Fabrics gets its stock from... https://www.renaissancefabrics.net/product/plum-silk-damask/ I have got to spend more time in the garment district!
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Yes, you should go shop at Home Fabrics.
DeleteVal
Also, maybe you could spraypaint some lace gold in order to get the effect you are looking for? I think I've seen that technique on the internet somewhere.
ReplyDeleteI'll keep that in mind next time the issue comes up. Thanks!
DeleteVal
Your costume is gorgeous! I love the fabric choice.
ReplyDeleteThank you Cynthia. The fabric feels as good as it looks
DeleteVal
Ooh, beautiful! I love that picture of the four of you.
ReplyDeleteThank you Cassidy, we've had a lot of really nice group ones with that gorgeous setting.
DeleteVal
OHmygoodness, you are so talented! What a job to tackle on such short notice as your friend Mara gave you! :D
ReplyDeleteI've been reading your posts from 2012 on Reform or Bloomer dress. My question is this: what changes did wearers make to their underwear? I'm finding no information on this topic!
ReplyDeleteCarol, they were wearing split drawers from back then to about the 1920s. The style of the necklines of chemises changed to work with the varying necklines of dresses. Is that what you meant?
DeleteVal
Also they combined their chemises and drawers into one piece called combinations. A variety was still worn.
DeleteThanks for your speedy reply. I was thinking of possible changes, due to the shorter skirt and wearing trousers. If a woman didn't have to deal with long skirts and petticoats, she might not feel the need to wear split drawers, and the drawers could be shorter, above the knee. I've seen a picture of 1850s combinations and thought they could be a practical garment under trousers, if they had a split crotch. I'm going to make a pair of those.
DeleteCarol, if you read my blog post on the bloomer dress I copied from the San Diego History Center, the bloomer pants with it were also split. So it would be logical to wear split drawers under that. My split drawers just barely go below my knee, and my bloomer pants are about 7" above the ankle, so plenty of room for them.
DeleteVal