Last month while trolling ebay I came across an extant gown
that looked in pretty good condition, close to my size, and a decent price,
$65. It had a look of elegance but not fashionable. It reminded me of a dress.
But where?
It looks black but its navy blue with narrow grey
pinstripes. When it arrived I found the fabric to be scratchy and thin. I’ve
never felt a lightweight wool but that’s what it reminded me of. I also thought
it might be a working class dress due to its material. But the collar and vest
insert is definitely real silk. The dress is all one piece, loose at the waist,
and the only closure is where the front overlaps the vest. The belt on this
photo from the seller looks kind of twisted but it drapes around the dress and
ties in the front but on a larger waist than they had. It has narrow shoulders so I can’t get it over
the shoulders of my dress form to see its full size. Which means I can’t try it
on. The collar looks to have been added on later or rather quickly as it’s just
basted with large stitches, and not very well. I guess it made it look better
and seems right for it though.
There are two buttons on the black collar just below the
lace one, and used to have two buttons on each cuff but they’re gone. The cuffs
are most interesting. Instead of an actual cuff, the fabric is folded over into
a pleat, tacked down, and buttons sewn on. Now it occurs to me that given the
larger width of the sleeve, this could be taking in the lower portion to narrow
it down. Just an idea but on my own sleeves when I’ve had this problem I’ve
just taken in the seams to narrow mine down. Might be worth trying.
The bottom of the skirt was the only place that showed real
damage. There are some holes worn on one side and a small one in the back. The
hem, which is already 6” deep, also had another 6” strip of the navy silk sewn to
the end of it so it had a 12” deep hem. Wow!
I took the silk portion off because a large chunk of it was missing just
about where the holes were so maybe someone stepped on it and ripped it? I’ll
never know. But the salvaged piece of silk will be nice for covering new
buttons on a dress.
I’m not real familiar with this time period about 1910-1914
so I asked for some help dating it on a vintage dress group. Suggestions ranged
from 1912 to 1916, with the suggestions of it being an older woman’s dress for
the later date but hanging on to earlier styles. Hmmm. I was more interested in
the date of its style. So I kept looking. I found a similar one on Pinterest
from the Norway Museum dated 1916 though. Pretty close.
It did remind me of something Mrs. Hughes on Downton Abbey
would wear. Suitable for the Head Housekeeper and keeping with her somber
attire. So I decided to name it Mrs. Hughes’ Dress.
My plans for this dress was to copy it for a pattern. Since
it’s close to my size, it wouldn’t require a lot of sizing up. I’m currently up
in Washington State visiting my Mom, who is a Pattern Drafting Extraordinaire. So
she’s currently working on that and trying to get me to stand still long enough
to make a muslin off of me to transfer to that and resize it. Not an easy task
as I don’t hold still very well. I think I was the same way when I was a
youngster when she made me dresses then.
Last night while reading a blog on Mr. Selfridge, I saw this. THAT’S
IT! That’s where I saw this dress. Or at least reminded me of it.
Agnes’ dress was much plainer but love her hairstyle. I
think I need to share this with my wig stylist.
When I get around to making my copy of the dress it will be
in a much more comfortable fabric. In fact I already have a couple pieces of
suit-weight stripped fabrics that look a lot like the original. I’ll probably
look more like Mrs. Hughes than the lovely young shop girls though.
This is part of the reason I’m up here in the Pacific
Northwest, playing dress-up at the Port Townsend Victorian Festival, and button
shopping at the vintage button trunk show in a local store. I was wearing this dress in the fashion show too, along with some of my friends. More on that later when I get home and download my photos from it.
~~~Val~~~
Oh what fun!! I love the dress you got from eBay and can't wait to see your version!! I adore Mrs. Hughes. She is beautiful and so very honorable. Your dress well be fantastic!
ReplyDeleteBlessings!
g
Thank you for the support, Gina. :)
DeleteVal
The collar was tacked on because it is removable to wash and starch.
ReplyDeleteThe style of the neck is called the Armistice style, for obvious reasons.
http://dressmakingresearch.com/1910s_dress.htm
Enjoy!
Thank you for the information, Marilyn.
DeleteVal
Oh, to be basted so it can be easily removed for washing and starching makes sense, because they did that in the 18th century too!
DeleteHow neat that you get to work with your mom on these projects and that she drapes!
Laurie
You looked great while shopping and you will probably look great in the dress after your new original as well!
ReplyDeleteThank you. Its' always sharing what I've made with the store where I purchased the supplies, whether it be buttons or fabric. The ladies there were very excited to see the buttons on my dress I'd bought last year.
DeleteVal
The sleeve is the same as the long sleeve in Past Patterns #6053 - a 1913-14 dress. I'm using the pattern at the moment to make a housekeepers frock. Though for an alt-universe character. I'm hoping that Downton Abbey's popularity will make it more recognisable as a housekeepers ensemble
ReplyDeleteThank you, Ista. Every bit of info helps, and I too want to keep Downton Abbey alive. I've barely started on my inspirations from it. I hope we can do a Downton tea one of these days.
DeleteVal